Credit & Cash Flow

Before You Count on Your Credit Line, Check the Terms

The Fed’s latest lending survey offers a reason to look beyond the interest rate and ask how much you can actually borrow.

Article Details

Type

Market commentary

Audience

Business owners, boards, financial leaders, and lenders

Reviewed By

Neil MassaDennis WilkesErik MortonLouis R. Dienes

CMBG Restructuring & Fiduciary Services Team

Publication

Published

November 5, 2026

Updated

Coverage

Credit LinesWorking CapitalBank LendingCash Flow

Important Scope Note

Insolvency decisions carry significant legal and personal-liability consequences and depend heavily on specific facts. Please contact us before acting.

Article Summary

Having a credit line is reassuring. Knowing exactly how much you can draw is more useful. This week’s lending survey is a prompt to check that number, understand what could change it, and make sure your cash forecast uses the same assumptions as your loan agreement.

Article Section

What Happened This Week

On November 2, the Federal Reserve released its October lending survey, covering changes that generally correspond to the third quarter. Banks reported modestly tighter approval standards for smaller businesses, while standards for large and middle-market firms were broadly unchanged. In this survey, small means annual sales below $50 million, not just a neighborhood shop.

It’s worth keeping the scale in perspective. In the detailed responses, 54 of 59 banks answering the small-business standards question reported no meaningful change. Four tightened and one eased. That is a modest net tightening, not evidence that banks have stopped lending.

The Fed also reported tighter collateral requirements and more use of interest-rate floors for smaller firms, on balance. Most other business-loan terms eased or stayed broadly unchanged. Our takeaway is not to panic about a credit crunch. It’s to look past the rate and make sure you understand the conditions attached to the money you’re counting on.

Article Section

A $2 Million Line Isn’t $2 Million in the Bank

Hypothetical credit line: a $2 million commitment is capped by a $1.5 million borrowing base. Subtracting $1.2 million already borrowed leaves $300,000 of additional borrowing capacity, assuming no other deductions or restrictions and all draw conditions are met. This is not cash already in the bank.

For an asset-based line, the amount available depends on the collateral that qualifies under the agreement. The OCC’s asset-based lending handbook explains how advances are limited by eligible collateral and the facility’s commitment. An invoice on your books is not automatically an invoice the bank will lend against.

Consider a hypothetical situation: your company has a $2 million line, but its borrowing base supports only $1.5 million. You have already borrowed $1.2 million. Assuming no other deductions or restrictions, and that all draw conditions are met, the remaining capacity is $300,000. It isn’t $800,000, and it certainly isn’t $2 million.

That difference matters when someone says, ‘We can cover it with the line.’ Before committing to a purchase, an expansion, or a payment schedule, you need to know which number they mean. The answer should come from current records and the agreement, not the amount printed at the top of an old term sheet.

Article Section

A Late Customer Can Create Two Problems

If a customer pays late, the obvious problem is missing cash. But if that receivable becomes too old to qualify under your borrowing-base rules, it can also reduce the amount you can borrow. You may have less financing available at the very moment you need more. Whether that happens depends on your agreement and the rest of your collateral.

This is why a cash forecast and a borrowing-availability forecast belong together. Move a large customer payment back a few weeks. Then check both the bank balance and the borrowing base. Don’t assume the line automatically fills whatever hole appears in the cash forecast.

The same discipline matters when a refinancing deadline is approaching: money you hope to obtain and money you can actually use are different things. Neither a national survey nor a friendly lender conversation can settle the question for your particular business.

Practical Takeaway

If your downside plan depends on drawing more from the line, check that the same downside doesn’t reduce what you’re allowed to draw.

Article Section

Four Questions for Your Next Lender Conversation

You don’t need to turn this into a complicated exercise. Ask the finance team and lender to work through four questions using the same current numbers:

  • How much can we draw today, after outstanding borrowings, reserves, letters of credit, and any other applicable deductions?
  • What could reduce that amount? Check overdue receivables, inventory eligibility, reporting requirements, and other conditions in the agreement.
  • What would the line cost under the rate scenarios in our forecast? Check the benchmark, margin, fees, and any interest-rate floor that limits how far the rate can fall.
  • If collections slow, when would we need a change to the facility, and how long would the lender need to consider it? An expected amendment is not an approved one.

Put the answers alongside the cash assumptions behind a 2027 budget. If the forecast relies on borrowing that isn’t currently available, show that separately and identify what has to happen before it becomes available. A spreadsheet shouldn’t quietly turn a financing request into a financing commitment.

Article Section

Our Takeaway

This week’s survey is a useful reason to revisit the details, not a reason to assume your bank is about to pull its support. The question is simpler: does the financing you have work the way your operating plan assumes it does?

You may find that everything lines up. If it doesn’t, you can adjust spending, work on collections, or discuss a different arrangement while there is still time to evaluate it. The useful number isn’t the size of the credit line. It’s how much you can use when the business needs it.

Behind this resource

About the authors

Jim Baer

Jim Baer

Founder & CEO

Jim Baer founded CMBG Advisors and advises boards, executives and business owners on corporate restructuring, financing, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate securities matters. His experience combines legal practice with executive leadership and strategic business advisory.

Lisa Van Eyssen

Lisa Van Eyssen

Executive Vice President, Head of Administration

Lisa leads CMBG's restructuring specialists and serves as the day-to-day executive contact for clients. Her work spans asset sales and liquidations, creditor claims and distributions, landlord negotiations, and employee and tax matters.

Reviewed by

CMBG Restructuring & Fiduciary Services Team

Neil Massa

Neil Massa

Chief Operating Officer, Head of Sales & Marketing

Neil leads CMBG's investigators and recovery specialists, overseeing wind-downs, asset sales, liquidations, and inventory and records management. His background includes more than 35 years in law enforcement and directing forensic investigations involving asset diversion and fraudulent transfers.

Dennis Wilkes

Dennis Wilkes

Head of Information Technology

Dennis brings more than 25 years of IT consulting experience with small businesses, large campuses and municipal facilities. He works across Mac and Microsoft environments, including network configuration and security.

Erik Morton

Erik Morton

Strategic Partner — New York

Erik brings deep expertise in SaaS and ecommerce transactions to CMBG's strategic network. Based in Albany, he extends the firm's reach across the Northeast, advising on founder liquidity events, roll-up strategies, and structured transactions for technology companies navigating growth and transition.

Louis R. Dienes

Louis R. Dienes

Strategic Partner — San Diego

Louis is a seasoned M&A attorney with more than two decades of experience handling mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures in technology and other growth industries. He has represented clients in more than $10 billion of concluded transactions, including complex domestic and cross-border deals. His partnership with CMBG strengthens the firm's transactional and restructuring capabilities across Southern California and beyond.