Practice Area

Article 9 Sales & Secured Creditor Remedies

Public and private secured-party sales, UCC foreclosures and loan-to-own transactions — structured to be commercially reasonable and documented to hold up later.

CMBG Advisors designs and executes public and private UCC Article 9 sales — also known as secured-party sales or UCC foreclosures — for secured lenders, private credit funds, investors, borrowers and other stakeholders. Properly structured, a lender-driven Article 9 process can preserve going-concern value, maximize recoveries and deliver a faster, less expensive alternative to bankruptcy, receivership or an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors. In consensual settings, practitioners sometimes describe these transactions as friendly foreclosures. CMBG brings more than 30 years of restructuring experience across more than 150 matters involving over $2 billion in assets, including substantial practical experience designing and executing public and private Article 9 processes.

Following a default, a secured creditor may sell its collateral through a commercially reasonable public or private disposition. Depending on the circumstances, the transaction may take the form of a third-party cash sale, a public sale involving a secured-creditor credit bid, a negotiated private disposition to a third party, an acceptance of collateral in satisfaction of the debt, or the purchase of a defaulted loan followed by a foreclosure sale through which the loan purchaser acquires the operating assets in a new entity.

The Process

  1. 01Default
  2. 02Structure & Valuation
  3. 03Notice
  4. 04Marketing
  5. 05Sale
  6. 06Close

Commercial Reasonableness

The Process Is the Protection

Article 9 gives a secured creditor broad flexibility in how it disposes of collateral, and imposes one overriding requirement: every aspect of the disposition — method, manner, time, place and terms — must be commercially reasonable.

That standard is where these transactions are won or lost. A disposition later found not to have been commercially reasonable can reduce or eliminate the lender's deficiency claim against the borrower and its guarantors, invite claims from junior lienholders, create damages exposure, and complicate the buyer's ability to finance, resell or defend the acquisition — particularly if the buyer's good faith is challenged. The exposure often surfaces months or years after closing, when the file is cold and the record is all that remains.

CMBG builds that record while the transaction is happening. We document the valuation basis, the marketing effort, the buyer universe contacted and the responses received, the notice program, the bid procedures and the rationale for the outcome — so that the lender, the buyer and their counsel can demonstrate, later and under scrutiny, that the process was sound.

Scope of Work

What CMBG Does

CMBG works alongside secured creditors, investors and their legal counsel to manage the commercial and operational components of the process, including:

Evaluating the collateral and the available enforcement alternatives

Coordinating lien, loan-document and collateral diligence with counsel

Developing the sale structure and transaction timeline

Obtaining and analyzing valuations and appraisals

Preparing the data room and buyer materials

Conducting targeted or broad-market buyer outreach

Managing public notices and private-sale communications

Establishing bid procedures and coordinating credit bids

Managing bidder diligence, negotiations and closing logistics

Coordinating the disposition of collateral that is not sold as part of the going concern

Supporting the post-sale accounting and the application of proceeds

Building a documented record supporting commercial reasonableness

CMBG is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Legal structure, notice sufficiency, lien analysis and documentation are directed by the secured creditor's counsel. We manage the commercial process alongside them.

Structure

Public and Private Article 9 Sales

Public Article 9 sales involve broad notice, active marketing, established bid procedures and a public sale date open to qualified bidders. They are particularly effective where broad market exposure is the best evidence of value — and where the secured creditor expects to credit bid.

That last point drives more structuring decisions than any other. A secured creditor may generally purchase the collateral at a public disposition. At a private disposition it generally may not, unless the collateral is of a kind customarily sold on a recognized market or the subject of widely distributed standard price quotations — which operating-business assets almost never are. A lender or loan purchaser that intends to acquire the business through a credit bid therefore needs a properly noticed and properly run public sale.

Private Article 9 sales involve a negotiated disposition to an identified third-party purchaser. They can be appropriate where the buyer universe is genuinely limited, where confidentiality is important to preserve customer, employee or supplier relationships, or where a qualified strategic buyer has already emerged. A private sale is not a shortcut around the commercial reasonableness standard: CMBG helps establish value, conduct a market check proportionate to the circumstances, and document why the process and the price were sound.

Alternative Remedy

Acceptance of Collateral (Strict Foreclosure)

In some circumstances a secured creditor may accept the collateral in full or partial satisfaction of the obligation rather than selling it. Strict foreclosure requires the debtor's consent and is subject to notice requirements and the objection rights of other parties with an interest in the collateral. Full satisfaction eliminates the covered obligation; partial satisfaction leaves the agreed balance subject to the governing documents and applicable law.

Where strict foreclosure is available and uncontested, it can be the fastest and least expensive path of all. Working alongside counsel, CMBG evaluates it with the sale alternatives and helps stakeholders assess the commercial effect of each path on the deficiency, junior interests and the resulting balance sheet.

Investors & Private Credit

Loan-to-Own Transactions

An investor may purchase a defaulted secured loan, step into the position of the secured creditor, and then conduct a properly noticed Article 9 sale. At a public sale, the loan purchaser may credit bid some or all of the acquired debt and take the collateral through a newly formed entity. Executed properly with counsel, this can be a faster and materially less expensive route to acquiring a distressed operating business than Chapter 11.

It also draws significant scrutiny. Under UCC Section 9-615(f), if the transferee is the secured party, a person related to the secured party or a secondary obligor, and the sale proceeds are significantly below the range a complying disposition to an unrelated party would have produced, the surplus or deficiency is generally calculated using the amount that compliant unrelated-party disposition would have produced. An affiliated credit bid is therefore not self-validating: the market evidence and the process record must support the value.

This is why we insist on running a real process even where the outcome looks predetermined. Genuine outreach, documented responses and a defensible valuation are what convert a loan-to-own transaction from an arrangement into an asset the buyer can finance, sell and defend.

Scope and Limits

What an Article 9 Sale Does — and Does Not — Do

A properly conducted Article 9 sale transfers the debtor's rights in the collateral to the buyer, discharges the security interest under which the sale is made and generally discharges subordinate security interests and liens, subject to applicable law. It does not extinguish senior liens, which generally travel with the assets unless separately released, paid or negotiated. It does not by itself resolve successor-liability exposure, which can arise in employment, environmental, tax, benefits and certain other contexts and must be analyzed with counsel. It does not automatically overcome contractual, statutory or consent restrictions affecting the transfer of licenses, customer contracts, permits or other rights. And it does not produce a court order approving the sale.

Those limits are manageable, and in most middle-market situations they are a fair trade for the speed and cost advantage. But they should be understood at the outset, priced into the structure, and addressed deliberately — not discovered at closing.

For Companies

If You Are the Borrower

Companies facing an Article 9 process are often told it is something being done to them. That is not always the case. A cooperative, well-run foreclosure can preserve the operating business, protect employees and customer relationships, and produce a better result for management, guarantors and junior stakeholders than a contested enforcement action or a liquidation. It can also reduce or resolve deficiency exposure that would otherwise follow the borrower and its guarantors.

CMBG helps borrowers and their counsel evaluate the commercial implications of the lender's proposed process, the company's practical leverage and the available restructuring alternatives. Legal rights and remedies — including what the lender may or may not do — are addressed by counsel.

At a Glance

Comparing the Paths

Article 9 SaleABCReceivershipChapter 11 / §363
Who controlsThe secured creditorAn independent assigneeA court-appointed receiverThe debtor in possession, subject to the court
Court involvementNoneNone or limitedCourt-supervisedFull court supervision
Typical timeline30–60 days30–90 days to a saleMonthsSeveral months or longer
Typical costLowestLowModerateHighest — often prohibitive for the middle market
Junior liensDischarged by the saleAddressed through the claims processAddressed by court orderRemoved by sale order; may attach to proceeds
Senior liensSurvive unless releasedSurvive unless releasedAddressed by court orderMay be sold free and clear
Buyer protectionStatutory transfer protections plus the process recordIndependent fiduciary and market recordCourt orderCourt order — the highest level available
Best whenA secured creditor controls the collateral and speed and cost matterNo controlling secured creditor and a broad creditor body must be addressedAssets need neutral custody or a dispute requires court supervisionThe estate can fund the case and maximum buyer protection is required

This comparison is general information, not legal advice, and describes typical outcomes only. Timelines, costs, lien treatment and available protections vary by jurisdiction, collateral type, capital structure and facts, and litigation or judicial relief can arise in any of these paths. The right approach depends on circumstances that should be reviewed with counsel.

Representative Work

Case Studies

Water Processing and Filtration Company

Loan Sale Followed by Article 9 Acquisition

Situation. A water-processing and industrial-filtration company in Central California had valuable equipment, intellectual property, long-standing customer relationships and a skilled operating workforce, but it had exhausted its liquidity and defaulted on its secured loan. The existing lender wanted an exit. An investor saw value in the operating business but was unwilling to fund a Chapter 11 case or assume the company's unrelated legacy liabilities.

Process. CMBG worked with the lender, the company, the prospective investor and their respective counsel to organize the collateral information, establish value and structure a loan-to-own transaction. The lender sold and assigned its secured loan to an investment vehicle affiliated with the prospective acquirer. After stepping into the secured creditor position, the loan purchaser commenced a properly noticed public Article 9 sale. CMBG coordinated the valuation, data room, marketing, notices, bidder inquiries, bid procedures and sale logistics, and contacted a broad set of strategic and financial parties so that the price was tested against the market rather than assumed. The loan purchaser ultimately credit bid to acquire the collateral through a newly formed operating company.

Result. The original lender monetized a distressed loan without funding a bankruptcy or a prolonged enforcement action. The buyer acquired the operating assets through a documented foreclosure process, preserved the core technology, the customer relationships and the operating workforce, and continued the viable portion of the business in a new entity — on a timeline measured in weeks rather than the many months a court-supervised process would have required.

Read the full case study

Advertising-Supported Digital Media Company

Accelerated Public Article 9 Sale

Situation. An advertising-supported media company distributed video content across connected televisions and screens in businesses and other commercial venues. The publicly held company had thousands of shareholders, multiple layers of secured debt, substantial unsecured liabilities and essentially no remaining cash. A Chapter 11 filing was evaluated, but the company could not fund the anticipated process and there was no viable standalone restructuring plan.

Process. CMBG designed and managed a public Article 9 sale on an approximately 30-day timeline. We coordinated the notices, established the data room, conducted buyer outreach, managed diligence and bidder communications and developed the bid procedures. Because the company was publicly held and had junior secured creditors, the process was built to be transparent and to give every constituency a genuine opportunity to participate: notice was broad, the sale was open, and both senior and junior secured creditors were given the ability to credit bid.

Result. A senior-lender-affiliated acquisition vehicle submitted the successful credit bid and acquired the operating assets through the public sale. The transaction was completed at a materially lower cost than Chapter 11. It produced essentially the same economic outcome a liquidating bankruptcy would likely have produced, but far faster and without requiring cash the company did not have.

Read the full case study

These anonymized case studies are based on CMBG engagements. To protect client confidentiality, names and certain industry, financial and identifying details have been altered or generalized. The processes and outcomes described are representative of work CMBG has performed.

Jim Baer, Founder & CEO at CMBG Advisors

Practice Lead

Jim Baer

Founder & CEO

Read full bio

Related Resources

Related Guides, Videos and Case Studies

These related guides, videos and case studies show how secured-party sales, credit bids and loan-to-own transactions get structured and defended in practice.

FAQ

Questions About Article 9 Sales

These are the questions lenders, investors, buyers and borrowers ask most often before a secured-party sale process begins.

Talk to Us Early

Article 9 outcomes are determined by decisions made before the notice goes out. If you are a lender evaluating enforcement alternatives, an investor considering a loan purchase, or a company that has received a default notice, the most useful conversation is the one that happens before the process starts. Initial consultations are confidential and without obligation.

Contact CMBG